<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Against Politics &#187; Anarchism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.againstpolitics.com/category/anarchism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.againstpolitics.com</link>
	<description>Toward a depoliticized society</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 17:28:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The national debt means nothing to us</title>
		<link>http://www.againstpolitics.com/2010/07/06/the-national-debt-means-nothing-to-us/</link>
		<comments>http://www.againstpolitics.com/2010/07/06/the-national-debt-means-nothing-to-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 23:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aschwin de Wolf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anarchism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Butler Shaffer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Debt Default]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[J.D. Tuccille]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Murray Rothbard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Repudiate the Debt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wendy McElroy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.againstpolitics.com/?p=912</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Tea Party is worried about the national debt. Public debt is not created by &#8220;us&#8221; but by the government (&#8220;them&#8221;) and there is no reason why one should feel morally obliged to pay it off. As Murray Rothbard has observed: The public credit transaction is not a genuine contract that need be considered sacrosanct, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.againstpolitics.com/2010/07/06/the-national-debt-means-nothing-to-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Important Voices interview with Anthony de Jasay</title>
		<link>http://www.againstpolitics.com/2010/06/01/important-voices-interview-with-anthony-de-jasay/</link>
		<comments>http://www.againstpolitics.com/2010/06/01/important-voices-interview-with-anthony-de-jasay/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 20:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aschwin de Wolf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anarchism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony de Jasay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Classical Liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Democracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gary Johnson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minimal Government]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.againstpolitics.com/?p=893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On March 15 2010 The Gary Johnson for President blog (!) featured a brief interview with Anthony de Jasay who &#8220;wishes to state, though, that he has no views on the candidacy of  Governor Gary Johnson for the Republican nomination.&#8221;  Asked why limited government is so hard to achieve, de Jasay answers: The main reason [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.againstpolitics.com/2010/06/01/important-voices-interview-with-anthony-de-jasay/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anything that&#8217;s peaceful</title>
		<link>http://www.againstpolitics.com/2010/05/28/anything-thats-peaceful/</link>
		<comments>http://www.againstpolitics.com/2010/05/28/anything-thats-peaceful/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 22:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aschwin de Wolf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anarchism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony de Jasay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ayn Rand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Consequentialism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contractarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Freedom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jan Narveson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Leonard E. Read]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Murray Rothbard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Natural Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Non-Aggression]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[R.W. Bradford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert Nozick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Hobbes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.againstpolitics.com/?p=884</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Libertarians spend a non-trivial amount of time arguing for the obvious. At best, such arguments are redundant because there is no widespread believe that violence or threats of violence are a good thing. At worst, these debates hurt the prospects for a society with less violence because theories about the existence of  &#8220;natural rights&#8221; are [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.againstpolitics.com/2010/05/28/anything-thats-peaceful/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The liberalization of libertarianism</title>
		<link>http://www.againstpolitics.com/2010/05/24/the-liberalization-of-libertarianism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.againstpolitics.com/2010/05/24/the-liberalization-of-libertarianism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 20:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aschwin de Wolf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anarchism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarianism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Modern Liberalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Public]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Racism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rand Paul]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.againstpolitics.com/?p=875</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the aftermath of the Rand Paul civil rights controversy a surprising number of self-identified libertarians have endorsed state-restrictions on freedom of association. In essence, the argument is that historical and contextual circumstances can warrant the broadening of anti-discrimination laws to the private sector. This  is not just  a trivial exception to the general libertarian [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.againstpolitics.com/2010/05/24/the-liberalization-of-libertarianism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The truth about voting</title>
		<link>http://www.againstpolitics.com/2010/05/19/the-truth-about-voting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.againstpolitics.com/2010/05/19/the-truth-about-voting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 23:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aschwin de Wolf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anarchism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Voting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Elections]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stefan Molyneux]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.againstpolitics.com/?p=856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.againstpolitics.com/2010/05/19/the-truth-about-voting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Non-violent resistance to ObamaCare</title>
		<link>http://www.againstpolitics.com/2010/03/25/non-violent-resistance-to-obamacare/</link>
		<comments>http://www.againstpolitics.com/2010/03/25/non-violent-resistance-to-obamacare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 00:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aschwin de Wolf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anarchism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Disobedience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mahatma Gandhi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nullification]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Secession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shikha Dalmia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.againstpolitics.com/?p=844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The public debate about health care indicates that the advocates of the socialization of health care have little respect for arguments about paternalism, coercion or small government. This leaves opponents of socialized health care various options including, but not limited to, supporting candidates to repeal the legislation, challenges in court, nullification, or secession. The ultimate [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.againstpolitics.com/2010/03/25/non-violent-resistance-to-obamacare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Barack Obama: Authoritarian</title>
		<link>http://www.againstpolitics.com/2010/01/26/barack-obama-authoritarian/</link>
		<comments>http://www.againstpolitics.com/2010/01/26/barack-obama-authoritarian/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 19:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aschwin de Wolf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anarchism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anti-Capitalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Individual Mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Michael Bakunin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Democracy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.againstpolitics.com/?p=783</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The surprising defeat of the Democrats in the recent Massachusetts elections has unleashed a great number of opinion pieces about the  mistakes of the Obama administration. A common theme in these articles is that the Obama administration fails to recognize that the United States is a right-of-center nation that consistently rejects the far-left / progressive  [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.againstpolitics.com/2010/01/26/barack-obama-authoritarian/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The useless Constitution</title>
		<link>http://www.againstpolitics.com/2010/01/18/the-useless-constitution/</link>
		<comments>http://www.againstpolitics.com/2010/01/18/the-useless-constitution/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aschwin de Wolf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anarchism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anthony de Jasay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Individual Mandate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lysander Spooner]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Obamacare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Randy Barnett]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.againstpolitics.com/?p=776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lysander Spooner expert and legal scholar Randy Barnett argues that Obamacare is unconstitutional. It does not seem likely that such an argument will prevail. Over the course of American history it has become clear that the Constitution presents little obstacle to a changing political climate. This makes the Constitution basically useless. When the prevailing political [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.againstpolitics.com/2010/01/18/the-useless-constitution/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The ruling class</title>
		<link>http://www.againstpolitics.com/2010/01/16/the-ruling-class/</link>
		<comments>http://www.againstpolitics.com/2010/01/16/the-ruling-class/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jan 2010 06:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aschwin de Wolf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anarchism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Harry Stein]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Progressives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Protest Generation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.againstpolitics.com/?p=773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In an engaging piece about the lack of ideological diversity in American theater Harry Stein makes the following perceptive observation: Like liberals everywhere, its creators imagine they’re speaking truth to power—when, in fact, they are the power, and guard it as jealously as any of the right-wing, American-allied dictators of yore they grew up protesting [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.againstpolitics.com/2010/01/16/the-ruling-class/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Libertarian centralism</title>
		<link>http://www.againstpolitics.com/2009/12/03/libertarian-centralism/</link>
		<comments>http://www.againstpolitics.com/2009/12/03/libertarian-centralism/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 23:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Aschwin de Wolf</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anarchism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[European Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Libertarian Centralism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nassim Nicholas Taleb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roderick Long]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Nations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.againstpolitics.com/?p=756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Centralization is ordinarily a sign of social decadence.&#8221; Russell Kirk From a &#8220;skeptical empiricist&#8221; perspective (to use  Nassim Nicholas Taleb&#8217;s useful phrase) neither &#8220;rationalist&#8221;  nor public policy approaches to libertarianism are particularly credible.  But what is quite remarkable about current debates about &#8220;libertarian centralism&#8221; is that libertarians associated with rationalist schools of thought (Austrian economics, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.againstpolitics.com/2009/12/03/libertarian-centralism/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
